Field Manual Notes from the trail

What is the best lens for wildlife photography?

Activities Wildlife Photography 3 min read

The best lens for wildlife photography is a fast telephoto in the 400 to 600mm range, ideally a zoom that pulls back to 200 or 300mm when the subject moves close. There isn’t a single best lens. The 100-400mm and 200-600mm zooms are the workhorses for most photographers, and the 500mm or 600mm primes are what working pros reach for when the budget allows.

There is no such thing as “too much focal length” in wildlife photography.

What “best” actually means here

It depends on what you shoot, where you shoot it, and what you can carry. The lens that’s right for sitting on a sand bar at McNeil River isn’t the lens that’s right for backpacking through the mountains. Reach is one variable. Weight, speed, and how well it handles in real conditions are the other three. Pick the lens that fits the work, not the lens that wins the spec sheet.

These two gorgeous young polar bear cubs put on a heluva show. Great fun to watch.
These two gorgeous young polar bear cubs put on a heluva show. Great fun to watch.

The standard wildlife lens kit

Most working wildlife photographers carry a long zoom and a mid-range zoom. The long zoom is something like a 100-400mm, 150-600mm, or 200-600mm. The mid-range is a 24-105mm or 70-200mm for context shots. That’s the kit. Some add a fast prime, usually a 500mm f/4 or 600mm f/4, when budget and their back allow it.

The zoom versus prime question matters less than people think. Modern zooms in this range are sharp enough that the image difference rarely shows up in a final print. Where the prime wins is in low light. An f/4 prime gathers more light than an f/6.3 zoom, and in coastal Alaska under overcast skies that one stop can be the difference between a usable file and a noisy one.

On the other hand, the flexibility of a nice zoom can be invaluable to capture widely differing compositions injustices moments apart.

The shorter end matters more than people admit

A 600mm prime gets you the tight portrait. A 70-200mm gets you the photograph that puts the animal in the place. Both are wildlife photography. The image of a brown bear standing in a salmon stream with the spruce ridge behind it isn’t made at 600mm. Most photographers under-pack the wider lenses, then come home with twenty versions of the same tight headshot. Don’t make that mistake.

What we’d recommend if you’re starting out

A 100-400mm zoom or its equivalent in your camera system. It’s the most flexible single lens for someone learning the craft. Not as long as you’d sometimes want, but long enough for most situations and short enough to use when an animal walks toward you. Add a 24-105mm later for the wider shots. Skip the 600mm prime until you’ve shot enough to know what you’re missing without it.

I also really like the hand-holdability of most zoom lenses. That’s a huge benefit over something requiring a sturdy tripod and heavy stable bullhead or gimbal. That doesn’t mean you shouldn’t get a 600mm f4. It just means there are endlesss pros and cons for such things, and you should weigh all those variables for yourself before deciding what system will work best for you.

Aperture and image stabilization matter

A faster lens (f/4, f/5.6) buys you shutter speed in poor light and helps with subject separation against a busy background. Image stabilization (IS, VR, OS depending on the brand) buys you handheld sharpness at slower shutter speeds. Both are worth paying for. Skipping them to save money on a long zoom usually shows up later as soft files in the conditions you most wanted to shoot.

Ask a Guide